Evaluation of Integrity Zones in Public Services at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Authors

  • Asep Rahmat Kurnia Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia
  • Abdulloh Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia
  • Slamet Sholeh Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia
  • Undang Ruslan Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.927

Keywords:

Bureaucratic Reform, Good Governance, Higher Education, Integrity Zone, Public Service, SERVQUAL

Abstract

The development of an integrity zone in higher education institutions is a national effort to create clean, accountable, and high-quality public services. This study evaluates the quality of public services at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, in the context of ongoing integrity zone implementation. A quantitative survey approach using the service quality model was employed a questionnaire covering five dimensions: reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and tangibles. The research respondents consisted of three groups of service users, namely educational staff, lecturers, and students, who were selected using proportional random sampling techniques. Data were collected online and analyzed descriptively. The results show that service quality is in the good category with average scores of 2.64 (educational staff), 2.71 (lecturers), and 3.25 (students). Reliability and assurance received the highest ratings across all groups, while empathy (among staff) and tangibles (among students) scored the lowest. Students were the most satisfied group, whereas educational staff were the most critical. The study concludes that the integrity zone initiative has been moderately effective, but further improvement in interpersonal communication, response speed, and digital-physical facilities is still required to achieve excellent service standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asiyai, R. I. (2022). Best practices for quality assurance in higher education: implications for educational administration. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(5), 843–854.

Asnawi, N., & Setyaningsih, N. D. (2020). Perceived service quality in Indonesian Islamic higher education context: A test of Islamic higher education service quality (i-HESQUAL) model. Journal of International Education in Business, 13(1), 107–130.

Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Manajemen pelayanan publik. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Elkhani, N., & Bakri, A. (2012). Review on “expectancy disconfirmation theory” (EDT) model in B2C e-commerce). Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, 2(12), 95–102.

Grönroos, C. (2007). Service management and marketing. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Hardiansyah. (2018). Kualitas pelayanan publik. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Hidayah, K., Esha, M. I. A., & Fikri, S. (2023). The regulation model of public services based on the integrity zone in the religious higher education in Indonesia. Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum, 6(3), 397–404.

Joseph, M., Yakhou, M., & Stone, G. (2005). An educational institution’s quest for service quality: Customers’ perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(1), 66–82.

KemenPAN-RB. (2021). Pedoman pembangunan zona integritas menuju WBK/WBBM. Jakarta: KemenPAN-RB.

KemenPAN-RB. (2022). Laporan reformasi birokrasi nasional. Jakarta: KemenPAN-RB.

KemenPAN-RB. (2024). Data nasional pencanangan ZI. Jakarta: KemenPAN-RB.

Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Standar nasional pendidikan tinggi. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.

Lestari, R. (2020). Penguatan pengawasan dalam reformasi birokrasi di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(1), 45–58.

Lu, H. P., & Wang, J. C. (2023). Exploring the effects of sudden institutional coercive pressure on digital transformation in colleges from teachers’ perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15991–16015.

McHaney, R. (2023). The new digital shoreline: How Web 2.0 and millennials are revolutionizing higher education. London: Taylor & Francis.

Noerhartati, E., Saurina, N., & Idris, A. (2023). Evaluating user satisfaction and educational impact of the sorghum entrepreneur marketplace: An application of the pieces framework. Research Horizon, 3(6), 668–679.

Oakland, J. S. (2014). Total quality management and operational excellence: Text with cases. London: Routledge.

Owusu, A. (2020). The impact of audio-visual technologies on university teaching and learning in a developing economy. South African Journal of Information Management, 22(1), 1–9.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Pate, A. N., Fleming, L., Jones-Bodie, A., Wagner, J. L., Fleming, J. W., Davis, C., & Brown, M. A. (2022). Impact of communication method and timeliness on student and faculty perception of professionalism and value. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(2), 83-91.

Prasad, R. (2024). From tradition to transformation: Digitizing examinations at Tribhuvan University through institutional and technological levers. NG Journal of Social Development, 16(2), 45–62.

Rahmawati, S. (2021). Implementasi zona integritas di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Kebijakan Pendidikan, 10(2), 87–100.

Rinaldi, A. (2020). Zona integritas dan reformasi birokrasi di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 12(1), 66–79.

Santi, A., Komariah, L., Mulawarman, W. G., Nurlaili, Akhmad, & Azainil. (2025). Strategies for managing facilities and infrastructure in inclusive schools. Research Horizon, 5(3), 933–944.

Sedarmayanti. (2017). Reformasi administrasi publik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Setiono, B. A., & Hidayat, S. (2022). Influence of service quality with the dimensions of reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy and tangibles on customer satisfaction. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 6(09), 330–341.

Stamatis, D. H. (2018). Total quality service: Principles, practices, and implementation. London: Routledge.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutrisno, & Mulyani. (2022). Digital governance dan pelayanan publik modern. Jurnal E-Government, 5(1), 29–47.

Tjiptono, F. (2017). Kualitas layanan dan kepuasan. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Wibowo, A. (2019). Manajemen SDM dalam reformasi birokrasi. Jurnal Manajemen Publik, 11(2), 55–70.

Yayu, Z. (2023). University administrators’ leadership style influencing instructors’ job satisfaction in Shanxi, China. Pacific International Journal, 6(4), 160–164.

Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. (2018). Services marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Kurnia, A. R., Abdulloh, Sholeh, S. ., & Ruslan, U. . (2025). Evaluation of Integrity Zones in Public Services at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang. Research Horizon, 5(6), 2665–2674. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.927

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.