A Literature Review of the Relationship between State-Owned Enterprises and Political Power in a Neo patrimonial Economy

Authors

  • Eka Nur Yulianti Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Widya Wiwaha, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/ebh.5.1.2026.1113

Keywords:

Corporatocracy, Systemic Corruption, State-Owned Enterprises, Political Economy, Neopatrimonialism, Public Procurement

Abstract

This article examines corporatocracy, a phenomenon where political and corporate power are intertwined in the Indonesian context, specifically the interrelationship between State-Owned Enterprises and political power within a neopatrimonial economic framework. Using a qualitative systematic literature review approach, this study examines the current literature on State-Owned Enterprises corruption. The analysis reveals that State-Owned Enterprises in Indonesia often serve as fertile ground for structural corruption. For example, public investment funds are often diverted to private pockets, while procurement mechanisms for goods and services are rife with bribery and nepotism. A closed bureaucratic culture that prioritizes patron-client relationships exacerbates this situation. The study compares various findings and confirms that the flow of bribery and collusion within SOEs leads to economic inefficiency and a loss of public trust. The implications of these findings highlight the need to strengthen oversight mechanisms, transparency, and institutional reform of State-Owned Enterprises. Recommendations for further research include empirical case studies on specific corporatocracies (e.g., in the energy or state finance sectors) and analyses of the effects of new State-Owned Enterprises policies to measure the effectiveness of corruption prevention measures at the structural level  

References

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. New York: Cornell University Press.

Azimattara, M. D. (2025). Patologi birokrasi dalam transformasi politik: studi fenomena pemanfaatan jabatan untuk kepentingan paternalisme dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan. Journal Evidence of Law, 4(3), 1251-1259.

Bondeli, J. V., Havenvid, M. I., & Solli-Sæther, H. (2021). Corruption in interaction: the role of social capital in private–public relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(11), 2098-2110.

Butt, S., Crockett, A., & Lindsey, T. (2024). Corruption and illegality in asian investment disputes: Indonesia. In Corruption and Illegality in Asian Investment Arbitration (pp. 259-284). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Hadiz, V. R., & Robison, R. (2013). The political economy of oligarchy and the reorganization of power in Indonesia. Indonesia, (96), 35-57.

Hanoteau, J., Pawitan, G., & Vial, V. (2021). Does social capital reduce entrepreneurs' petty corruption? Evidence across Indonesian regions. Papers in Regional Science, 100(3), 651-671.

Harianto, B. (2025). Kerugian negara diakibatkan oleh Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) sebagai kerugian keuangan negara. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 3(4), 3899-3905.

Husen, A. F. (2024). Dynamics of the relationship of political parties and cultural patron clients. Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 14(2), 262-270.

Hutchcroft, P. D. (2014). Linking capital and countryside: Patronage and clientelism in Japan, Thailand, and the Philippines. In Clientelism, social policy, and the quality of democracy (pp.174-203).

Jahja, N. J., Mohammed, N. F., & Lokman, N. (2023). Corruption Cases in Relation to State-Owned Enterprise in Indonesia. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences.

Khan, M. S. (2022). Quality of governance, social capital and corruption: local governance and the Pakistan marketplace. Review of Social Economy, 80(2), 220-249.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2021). Laporan tahunan KPK 2020. KPK Republik Indonesia. Retrieved September 2, 2025 from https://cms.kpk.go.id/storage/4209/Laporan-Tahunan-KPK-2021.pdf.

Nurhasim, M. (2021). The potential ethical violation in the parallel election in 2024. Jurnal Etika dan Pemilu, 7(1), 25-45.

OECD. (2018). State-owned enterprises and corruption: What are the risks and what can be done? OECD. Retrieved September 2, 2025, from https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/08/state-owned-enterprises-and-corruption_g1g90cb1/9789264303058-en.pdf

Perkins, J. (2016). The new confessions of an economic hit man. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Prechel, H. (2022). Corporate fraud, corruption, and financial malfeasance. Retrieved on October 25, 2025, from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/61796/chapter-abstract/546058750?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Putri, T. A., & Sitabuana, T. H. (2022). Pengawasan pengelolaan keuangan negara terhadap Badan Usaha Milik Negara (Bumn). Sibatik Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 1(7), 1003-1018.

Robinson, R. (2010). Indonesia: The rise of capital. Equinox Publishing. Rectrived September 2, 2025 from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=woSrAZ13P2IC&printsec=copyright&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false

Transparency International. (2017). Preventing corruption in state-owned enterprises. Rectrieved September 5, 2025 from https://www.transparency.org/en/news/how-to-prevent-corruption-in-state-owned-enterprises.

Wang, J. (2024). “Hurdles” or “lubricants”: Petty corruption and Chinese migrants in Africa. In Sociological Forum (Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 66-78).

Yogi Prabowo, H. (2014). To be corrupt or not to be corrupt: Understanding the behavioral side of corruption in Indonesia. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 17(3), 306-326.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Yulianti, E. N. (2026). A Literature Review of the Relationship between State-Owned Enterprises and Political Power in a Neo patrimonial Economy. Economic and Business Horizon, 5(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.54518/ebh.5.1.2026.1113

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.