No-Fault Compensation System and Restorative Justice in Medical Dispute Resolution: A Lesson from New Zealand for Indonesia

Authors

  • I Kadek Eka Sujana Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Ma’mum Fikri Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.857

Keywords:

Health Law, Hybrid Model, Medical Dispute Resolution, No-Fault Compensation, Restorative Justice

Abstract

Medical dispute resolution in Indonesia relies on a fault-based litigation model, which burdens patients with high evidentiary standards, stigmatizes physicians, and hinders systemic learning in healthcare. This article aims to explore the potential of integrating a no-fault compensation system with restorative justice as an alternative framework. The research adopts a normative juridical method combined with comparative legal analysis, using New Zealand’s accident compensation corporation as a primary comparative model. Findings indicate that Indonesia’s mechanism fails to ensure equitable remedies and often results in defensive medicine. New Zealand’s no-fault compensation system demonstrates efficiency and patient-centeredness. However, the no-fault compensation system alone may lack the relational repair component that restorative justice provides. The proposed hybrid no-fault restorative justice model combines material justice (compensation without proof of negligence) with relational justice (acknowledgement, apology, and trust restoration). This integrated approach is normatively consistent with Indonesia’s constitutional commitment to social justice and resonates with cultural values of deliberation. The hybrid no-fault restorative justice model could transform Indonesia’s health law from a punitive, adversarial paradigm into a preventative, restorative, and patient-centered system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardi, M. K., Laksito, F. H. B., & Laurent, A. (2023). Role and position of Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Honour Council: fair medical dispute resolution. Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, 1(3), 185-201.

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bismark, M., & Paterson, R. (2006). No-fault compensation in New Zealand: Harmonizing injury compensation, provider accountability, and patient safety. Health Affairs, 25(1), 278–283.

Deffains, B., & Fluet, C. (2014). Social norms and legal design: fault-based vs strict liability offences. In LET 2014 conference paper, UC Berkeley Law School, 13-25.

Garattini, L., & Padula, A. (2020). Defensive medicine in Europe: a ‘full circle’? The European Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 165–170.

Hussaini, N., & Varon, J. (2023). Fostering trust in critical care medicine: A comprehensive analysis of patient-provider relationships. Critical Care & Shock, 26(6), 32-36.

Karjoko, L., Rachmi, I. G. A. K., Handayani, Jaelani, A. K., Barkhuizen, J., & Hayat, M. J. (2021). The urgency of restorative justice on medical dispute resolution in Indonesia. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 16(2), 362–392.

Kasuri, M. R., Abbas, S., & Mahmood, T. (2024). Adversarial and inquisitorial; two rival models of criminal procedure and theory of convergence: an appraisal. Journal of Law Social Studies (JLSS), 6(1), 73-84.

Kusworo, D. L., & Fauzi, M. N. K. (2023). Implementation of litigation mediation in resolving medical negligence disputes between patients and health workers. Administrative and Environmental Law Review, 4(1), 21–36.

Lakoro, D. D. K., Jumrati, & Jamaludin, A. (2025). Legal responsibility of health professionals in protecting patient data. Research Horizon, 5(3), 869–878.

Maskanah, U. (2023). Implementation of restorative justice in medical dispute resolution. Jurnal Aisyah: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 8(2), 24-40.

Maulana, A., Praja, C. B. E., & Hakim, M. L. (2023). Compensation as hospital liability for negligence in medical services harming patients: empirical study of several peace agreements. Varia Justicia, 19(2), 153-167.

Mello, M. M., Studdert, D. M., DesRoches, C. M., Peugh, J., Zapert, K., Brennan, T. A., & Sage, W. M. (2004). Caring for patients in a malpractice crisis: physician satisfaction and quality of care. Health Affairs, 23(4), 42–53.

Munandar, M. A., Muchtar, S., & Ramli, R. N. H. (2025). Restorative justice in medical case resolution for health and medical workers. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(5), 3385–3391.

Mustika, N. W. E., Darma, I. M. W., Kurniawan, I. G. A., & Thapa, N. Y. (2023). Restorative justice settles health disputes between patients and hospitals from an inclusive justice perspective. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 11(3), 423–436.

Paterson, R. (2013). The good doctor: what patients want. Auckland: Auckland University Press.

Putri, F. F. (2023). Advantages and disadvantages of restorative justice approach in medical dispute resolution. Progressive Law Review, 5(02), 156–168.

Rahman, F., Margaretha, & Sapsudin, A. (2025). Legal issues in limiting authority of health professional organizations after Indonesia’s 2023 health law enactment. Research Horizon, 5(4), 1501–1512.

Small, P. M. (2019). Structural justice and nursing: inpatient nurses’ obligation to address social justice needs of patients. Nursing ethics, 26(7-8), 1928-1935.

Studdert, D. M., Mello, M. M., Sage, W. M., DesRoches, C. M., Peugh, J., Zapert, K., & Brennan, T. A. (2005). Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA, 293(21), 2609–2617.

Triana, W. Y., & Sulistyorini, S. (2021). The effectiveness of mediation as an alternative to medical dispute resolution: a systematic review. STRADA: Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan, 10(1), 1051–1056.

Utama, M. S., Zamroni, M., & Putera, A. P. (2024). Settlement of medical disputes through litigation and non-litigation. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 5(3), 668–676.

Vento, S., Cainelli, F., & Vallone, A. (2018). Defensive medicine: It is time to finally slow down an epidemic. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 6(11), 406–409.

Wallis, K. (2013). New Zealand’s 2005 “no-fault” compensation reforms and medical professional accountability for harm. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 126(1371), 33–44.

Wallis, K. A. (2015). Learning from no-fault treatment injury claims to improve the safety of older patients. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(5), 472–474.

Wallis, K. A. (2017). No-fault, no difference: no-fault compensation for medical injury and healthcare ethics and practice. British Journal of General Practice, 67(654), 38–39.

Weiler, P. C. (1991). Medical malpractice on trial. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2019). Global patient safety action plan 2021-2030. New York: WHO Press.

Zehr, H. (2015). The little book of restorative justice: Revised and updated. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Zweigert, K., Kötz, H., & Weir, J. A. (1998). Introduction to comparative law (3rd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Sujana, I. K. E., & Fikri, A. M. . (2025). No-Fault Compensation System and Restorative Justice in Medical Dispute Resolution: A Lesson from New Zealand for Indonesia. Research Horizon, 5(6), 2945–2956. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.857

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.