Executorial Power of Restitution against Actors as a Form of Crime Victims in Indonesia

Authors

  • Lusia Sulastri Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Bahtiyar Efendi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.3.2.2023.104

Keywords:

Executive power, Restitution, Victims, Criminal act, Indonesia

Abstract

The existence of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2022 Concerning Procedures for Completion of Applications and Granting Restitution and Compensation to Victims of Criminal Acts has, in fact, postponed the right of victims to ask for compensation from the perpetrators, but the perpetrators in this case alone cannot carry out the compensation that has been decided. Based on this, this study aims to examine the power of implementing restitution for perpetrators as a form of recovery for victims of criminal acts in Indonesia and the concept of effective restitution for perpetrators as a form of recovery for victims of criminal acts normatively. The research results show that restitution for perpetrators as a form of recovery for victims of criminal acts in Indonesia has weak executive power. The concept of effective restitution for perpetrators as a form of recovery for victims of criminal acts in Indonesia requires the concept of reward in return for good faith and punishment in the form of resolving certain rights, the concept of tracing assets and confiscation, and the authority of judges to calculate the victim's losses themselves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alya, A. (2021). Setya Wahyudi, dan Rani Hendriana, Implementasi Restitusi Bagi Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Wonosobo), Jurnal Soedirman Law Review 3 (4) 704

Asshiddiqie, J. (2004). Konstitusi Dan Konstitualisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Dan Pusat studi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Hukum UI.

De Quervain, D. J. F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., & Fehr, E. (2004). The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305(5688), 1254-1258.

Didik, M., Mansur, A., & Gultom, E. (2007). Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Frank, L. F. (1992). The collection of restitution: An often-overlooked service to crime victims. John's J. Legal Comment., 8, (107).111.

Garner, B. A. (1999). Black’s law dictionary, St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1276.

Gosita, A. (1993). Masalah Korban Kejahatan, Jakarta: Akademika Presindo.

Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2009). Punishment and beyond: Achieving justice through the satisfaction of multiple goals. Law & Society Review, 43(1), 1-38.

Lollar, C. E. (2014). What is criminal restituion. Iowa Law. Rev., 100, (93).99.

Marasabessy, F. (2016). Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana: Sebuah Tawaran Mekanisme Baru. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 45(1), 53-75.

Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1985). Social authority: Obtaining, evaluating, and establishing social science in law. U. Pa. L. Rev., 134, 477.

Muladi, A., & Nawawi, B. (1998). Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Bandung: Alumni.

Muladi, H. A. M. (2005). Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Natabaya, H. A., S. (2008). Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press dan Tata Nusa

Nufus, W. H. (2023). Jaksa Tanya Nasib Mario Dandy Jika Tak Bisa Bayar Rp 120 M, LPSK Jawab Begini. Available: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6783200/jaksa-tanya-nasib-mario-dandy-jika-tak-bisa-bayar-rp-120-m-lpsk-jawab-begini

Pamudji, P. M. (2023). Kekuatan Eksekutorial Surat Paksa Dalam Percepatan Penyelesaian Piutang Negara, Available: https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-tegal/baca-artikel/14188/Kekuatan-Eksekutorial-Surat-Paksa-Dalam-Percepatan-Penyelesaian-Piutang-Negara.html.

Reiman, J., & Leighton, P. (2015). Rich get richer and the poor get prison, the (subscription): Ideology, class, and criminal justice. Routledge.

Sahetapy, J. E. (1987). Viktimologi: sebuah bunga rampai. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Soekanto, S dan Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Rajawali Pres.

Strang, H., & Sherman, L. W. (2003). Repairing the harm: Victims and restorative justice. Utah L. Rev., 15.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Sulastri, L., & Efendi, B. (2023). Executorial Power of Restitution against Actors as a Form of Crime Victims in Indonesia. Research Horizon, 3(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.3.2.2023.104

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.